statcounter




Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Trump' FCC Plans Destruction of Net Neutrality


This is a disaster, It would be bad enough if raising fees to use the net meant I can't read comic books or looking at little You Tube things,No more music,That's my  major connection to the music I love. But the move means much more than curtailment of pleasure surfing,It's the blow to the resistance,Its closing of the only sources of information for countering Trump's lies and it's the only way to fight by spreading the word, Also for me it means no more books. No more blog n o more theological research,

We only have until early December to act!

ALYSSA NEWCOMB "THE END IS NEAR FOR OBAMA ERA NEW NEUTRALITY RUELES," NBC NEWS
(NOV 21 2017, 4:51 PM ET)
 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/end-near-obama-era-net-neutrality-rules-n822901

Everything from the way you use banking apps to the speed of your Netflix stream could soon be changing, if all goes to plan for the Federal Communications Commission.
The FCC's mission — essentially gutting the internet as we know it — would allow service providers to create so-called fast and slow lanes for subscribers.
Commission Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican, announced on Tuesday a plan to put an end to what he called the federal government's "micromanaging" of the internet. Details of the proposal will be released on Wednesday, three weeks before it will be put to a vote by the FCC on Dec. [read More]

SIGN PETITION tell congress
https://savethenetfromtrump.com/

CALL YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS 202-224-3121
Republican Senators* at (844) 241-1141 

Share this on social media put it on your blog,send links, Tell everyone, this is a disaster, This will kil all resistance to Trump, this is nothing less than control of the media,




[1] 
[2] ALYSSA NEWCOMB "THE END IS NEAR FOR OBAMA ERA NEW NEUTRALITY RUELES," NBC NEWS
(NOV 21 2017, 4:51 PM ET)
 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/end-near-obama-era-net-neutrality-rules-n822901

Friday, November 10, 2017

Has Trump saved the economy? NO!


U.S. job creation 2008-2012 (BLS)



On CBS this Morning (this morning--Nov. 10,3017) a focus group with Trump supporters revealed that every one of them redirected the propaganda  line that Trump has saved the economy. They really believe that Trump's deregulation and his confidence has created the upturn in the stock market and that created the upsurge in employment, this is manifest bunk, Back in 2012 I read prediction that two million jobs would be added to the economy over the next few years, Jobs are indicative of a growing healthy economy,Let's look at some of those predictions:


Obama battles job crisis


These are old articles showing the projected job increase expected before Trump even ran all accesed Nov 7 2017

"The White House Predicts 2 million more jobs in 2012"
 @CNNMoney February 17, 2012: 4:41 PM ET
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/17/news/economy/obama_job_creation/index.htm

"New forecasts from the Council of Economic Advisers estimate 2 million jobs will be added in 2012."

The document, which totals 446 pages, is the administration's blueprint for the economy, which outlines a plan to "recover, rebalance and rebuild." Much like Obama's recent State of the Union address, it focuses heavily on income inequality, and building an America where "everyone gets a fair shot."
One way to do that is job creation. While 1.8 million jobs were created last year, the economy still needs to add about 5.6 million jobs to get back to 2008 employment levels -- and that's without accounting for population growth.[read more]

"Occupational Employment projections to 2022"
Monthly Labor Review, Bureau Labor Statistics, Department of Labor (Dec. 2013)
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/occupational-employment-projections-to-2022.htm


Total employment in the U.S. economy is projected to grow by 15.6 million during the 2012–2022 decade to reach 161 million; this represents a 10.8-percent employment increase. Some of the fastest projected growth will occur in the healthcare, healthcare support, construction, and personal care fields. Together, these four occupational groups are expected to account for about one-third—more than 5.3 million—of all new jobs during this period.
Total employment in the U.S. economy is projected to grow to 161 million, or 10.8 percent, over the 2012–2022 decade and add 15.6 million jobs to the 2012 employment level of 145.4 million. Of the 818 occupations for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) produces and publishes projections data, 667 are projected to add jobs and 151 are expected to decline in employment during the 2012–2022 period. Some of the fastest projected growth will occur in the healthcare, healthcare support, construction, and personal care fields. Together, these four occupational groups are expected to account for more than 5.3 million new jobs by 2022, about one-third of the total employment growth.
Occupational projections provide information on how changes in demographics, technology, consumer preferences, and other factors are expected to affect the future labor force. Job seekers and career counselors use this information to see where the strongest or weakest growth is expected to be over the coming decade. Policymakers use the projections for long-term policy planning, and states use the data to prepare state and area projections.[read more]

"December Jobs: 1.8 Million jobs created in 2012"
JILL SCHLESINGER MONEYWATCH January 4, 2013, 4:27 PM
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/december-jobs-18-million-jobs-created-in-2012/

The December jobs report marked the 5th anniversary of the beginning of the "Great Recession", which makes now a good time to provide a snapshot of labor market progress. Beginning in December 2007 through December 2012, the U.S. economy shed a total of approximately 3.9 million jobs, of which the government accounted for a quarter and the private sector three-quarters. A devastating 8 million jobs were lost in 2008 and 2009, before the recovery created 4.7 million over the last three years. In other words, the job market has come a long way from the dark days of the Great Recession, but has a lot more ground to cover
For 2013, economists predict that average monthly job growth should increase only slightly to 165,000 and the annual average unemployment rate will be 7.7 percent. Expectations are muted due to the second phase of the so-called "fiscal cliff" negotiations, which will focus on focus on a reduction in government spending in order to address the nation's mushrooming $16 trillion debt burden.
It's important to underscore that when the government spends fewer dollars, it creates a negative impact on economic growth. J.P. Morgan chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli expects that fiscal cliff issues "will probably hold things back awhile." The extent of the damage depends entirely on the amount of reduction and the pace at which it will occur. Throughout the fiscal cliff debate, critics of tax increases and spending cuts worried that the dual effect would throw the country into another recession.[read more]
I get that the title of the last one refers to seasonal job but the quotes make clear not all the forcasts are seasonal,

According to these 2013 sources the economic condition we see today could easily be accounted for by the forecasts made in 2013 or even 2012. Long before Trump was running, Clearly the aritcle links at least a third of it to Obama;s policies.

Here i a 2017 article from a conservative source arguing that the big upturn is not due to Trump. Some aspects of it are affected by Trump but for the most part he has not had time to have a a major effect,

"The Trump Stockmarket Ralley: Don't Thank Trump"LARRY LIGHT MONEYWATCH November 10, 2017, 6:00 AM
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-stock-market-rally-dont-thank-trump/


When Donald Trump won the White House 12 months ago, the stock market took off. And the president often takes credit for that. In a recent tweet, he attributed the ongoing rally to "great confidence" in his administration's policies.
The truth, though, is that the president -- indeed, any president -- has only limited powers to affect the market, which is driven more by corporate earnings and economic forces.
"In the first few months" of Mr. Trump's presidency, said Garrett Oakley, a financial planner with online financial adviser Betterment, investors were excited about Mr. Trump's ambitious plans for tax cuts and huge public works projects. "But that became priced in," meaning the thrill faded after nothing happened and investors turned elsewhere for inspiration.
The rally predates the Trump presidencyIndeed, with a few hiccups, the market has been on an ascending trajectory since March 2009, at the outset of Barack Obama's administration, and the so-called "Trump bump" is the just latest leg upward. Stock valuations, as measured by the 12-month forward price-earnings multiple, have been "roughly constant for the past two years," said Nicholas Atkeson, a founding principal of Delta Asset Management. 
Oddly enough, Mr. Trump's lack of legislative success may have helped the market, said Jeffrey Sherman, deputy chief investment officer at DoubleLine Capital. In an interview with Yahoo Finance, he noted: "Markets don't like change. And for that I'll give the president credit that he really hasn't changed much thus far, at least when it comes to financial and fiscal policy." [read more]





Thursday, November 9, 2017

Still raving against Hillary after all this year

Image result for french mariAnne


from a blog I post on

Blogger ficino4ml said...
One of the outcomes of toxic systems - you'd think they were designed this way - is abuse of the less powerful by the more powerful AND enabling/cover ups by other equally or more powerful figures. Right-wing Christianity manifests this syndrome as do many corporations and other institutions.
November 09, 2017 6:12 AM
Blogger Legion of Logic said...
"Right-wing Christianity manifests this syndrome as do many corporations and other institutions."

Indeed, the Democrats excel at this very thing. Quite sad to watch people get taken advantage of like that.

Out of curiosity, does anyone here actually think that Hillary Clinton is a candidate a Christian could happily support without a serious conflict of interest? And can anyone name a Republican candidate from 2016 that the left would not have criticized Christians for choosing? Not talking about compared to Trump, just in of themselves.
November 09, 2017 7:20 AM
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
And if no such evidence is discovered, will the left stop talking about Russian collusion as if it was a fact? Hmm.

No! why should we? we know enough now to see that he did not win the election! He may not have openly decided to tea up with Russia but he clearly benefited from what they did in ways that altered the out come. He fell into a crack that should not have been there,he won one state by the skin of his teeth that happened to allow the electoral vote to favor the choice the people did not accept.

the American people voted for Hillary,the electoral vote did not reflect and never reflects the will of the people. It reflect only a constrict created by 18th century pundits a a failsafe against the kind of man Trump it didn't even do it' job,

read the Federalist Papers




November 09, 2017 7:55 AM
 Delete
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
at the very least he has no mandate why should I give him one? 13,000 people a year will die becauseof his stupidity deregulation of coal burnish pollution--that is proven) you can explain it all to then in heaven.
November 09, 2017 8:12 AM
 Delete
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
Out of curiosity, does anyone here actually think that Hillary Clinton is a candidate a Christian could happily support without a serious conflict of interest? And can anyone name a Republican candidate from 2016 that the left would not have criticized Christians for choosing? Not talking about compared to Trump, just in of themselves

LL when are you going to lay on me some provable data to show what she did this is bother pizza thing? All I get is "its so obvious: well ant obvious to me, give me something I can take to the ballot box,,
November 09, 2017 8:41 AM
 Delete
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
LL "And Trump beat Hillary for a host of reasons,..."

In the lala land of evangelical fantasy time, in reality he did not beat her at all,the American people voted against him, he intimidated voters in North Carolina that it did not offset Michigan, and they stole Florida again.

black turn out in Florida and NC were way down, the did have fear squads roaming Hispanic neighborhoods in fort worth initiated Spanish voters,
November 09, 2017 8:48 AM
 Delete
Blogger Hugo Pelland said...
Wow, so much BS from both the article and the comments here... but the worst must be:
- Still talking about Hillary 1 year after the election instead of assessing the disaster of the current POTUS administration.
- Still claiming there was 'nothing there ' in the Russia-related scandals after actual indictments happened.
- Calling soccer footbal on an American-owned blog (j/k)
November 09, 2017 9:04 AM
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
Blogger Legion of Logic said...
Joe: "still think it's really about the audacity of a woman who dared to seek power and play the game like men do."

This is perhaps the biggest hurdle to the left understanding conservatives. Leftists seem to think that conservatives aren't progressives due to some form of bigotry, when in fact there was precisely zero reason for a conservative to vote for any politician with the policies Hillary advocated. And yet the left blames sexism, as though if only Hillary had been Harry we would have voted against our own interests to put another Clinton in office.

No that is nonsense. I understand conservatives very well. By that I do not mean "I understand how stupid they are." No I undertaker their view point as they understand it and I can respect that.My niece who I grew up with is a right wing conservative intellectual and of great integrity. That does not make Hillary the Whore of Babylon, that is not a failing Hillary that you have a conservative view,so far all you have told me is that you hate her because she has a different vied,

I've spoken with many Trump supporters as to why and how they could support him during the primaries especially, given that he was an obvious liar and not exactly a reliable conservative, and not once was "Women belong in the kitchen!!!" given as the reason. Trump beat the rest of the field because conservatives are sick of Republicans, simple as that, but they are still opposed to progressive policies.

therefore Hillary is the whore of Babylon.


And Trump beat Hillary for a host of reasons, but I firmly believe any sexism was canceled out by people who voted for Hillary BECAUSE she was a woman - and yes, these people proudly announced themselves.

sexism is their motive for demonizing her.


Just look at demographic statistics of the last several elections and you'll see that the male/female, black/white divides are remarkably consistent all the way back into the 90s, with two exceptions - Obama's first election when he swept the board, and the '96 election where Perot siphoned votes. Otherwise the major indicator of how a particular demographic would vote statstically was whether the candidate was a Democrat or Republican, and Hillary was no different. Sexism had nothing to do with it.

I have voted against a lot of people without chanting lock her up
November 09, 2017 9:09 AM
 Delete
Blogger Joe Hinman said...
Hugo Pelland said...
Wow, so much BS from both the article and the comments here... but the worst must be:
- Still talking about Hillary 1 year after the election instead of assessing the disaster of the current POTUS administration.
- Still claiming there was 'nothing there ' in the Russia-related scandals after actual indictments happened.
- Calling soccer footbal on an American-owned blog (j/k)

ROTFLOL!! boravo Hugo!