statcounter




Friday, March 17, 2017

Trump, Fascism, and The Rise of hate

Image result for Metacrock's blog ideology



Steve Bannon Once Suggested Only property owners should vote

  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/28/steve-bannon-once-suggested-only-property-owners-should-vote-what-would-that-look-like/?utm_term=.ae6722d6bde2



When America was born, the right to vote largely extended only to white men who owned property. In the early 1800s, that expanded outward slightly to include white men regardless of property ownership. In the wake of the Civil War, it expanded outward again to include nonwhite men (though this didn’t mean they could immediately vote). About a century ago, another expansion: Women were given the right to vote and, setting aside efforts to artificially restrict voting, every American citizen had suffrage. Done and done.
In its Monday editions, the New York Times reported on a conversation in which Stephen K. Bannon, named as a senior strategist by President-elect Donald Trump, had allegedly floated the idea of reverting the right to vote back to the 18th century. The Times quotes Julia Jones, a former colleague of Bannon’s when he worked in the film industry.
Ms. Jones, the film colleague, said that in their years working together, Mr. Bannon occasionally talked about the genetic superiority of some people and once mused about the desirability of limiting the vote to property owners.
“I said, ‘That would exclude a lot of African-Americans,’ ” Ms. Jones recalled. “He said, ‘Maybe that’s not such a bad thing.’ I said, ‘But what about Wendy?’ ” referring to Mr. Bannon’s executive assistant. “He said, ‘She’s different. She’s family.’ ”
This is not something that should be considered a current policy proposal from Bannon (or, for that matter, from Trump). But it raises an interesting question: What would happen if the franchise were extended only to those who own property?

Combative Populist Steve Bannon Found His Man in Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/27/us/politics/steve-bannon-white-house.html?_r=1&mtrref=thinkprogress.org&gwh=3EC56B578B7C2B139275EEFDA78A81C9&gwt=pay

In a radio interview last year with Mr. Trump, Mr. Bannon complained, inaccurately, that “two-thirds or three-quarters of the C.E.O.s in Silicon Valley are from South Asia or from Asia.” He has sometimes portrayed a grave threat to civilization not just from violent jihadists but from “Islam.” He once suggested to a colleague that perhaps only property owners should be allowed to vote. In an email to a Breitbart colleague in 2014, he dismissed Republican congressional leaders with an epithet and added, “Let the grass roots turn on the hate.”
(read article in link above)

This call to unleash the hate of the grass roots has been headed by the rise of ate groups

Southern Poverty Law Center Says Hate Groups om the Rise

 Washington post 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/southern-poverty-law-center-says-american-hate-groups-are-on-the-rise/2017/02/15/7e9cab02-f2d9-11e6-a9b0-ecee7ce475fc_story.html?utm_term=.e39450060733

According to the SPLC*, the number of American hate groups has been climbing steadily for most of the past 30 years, but the new arrivals to the SPLC’s list in 2016 were predominantly characterized as white nationalist and anti-Muslim groups.
“By far, the most dramatic change was the enormous leap in anti-Muslim hate groups,” wrote the report’s author, Mark Potok, an SPLC senior fellow. The report says hate groups in the United States nearly tripled, from 34 in 2015 to 101 last year.
Nearly 50 of those new additions are local chapters of ACT for America, an anti-Muslim activist group that claims Michael Flynn, who this week resigned as Trump’s national security adviser, as a board member.
Potok argues that Trump’s rhetoric throughout the campaign — including calls for a ban on immigration from some Muslim-majority countries, proposals for ideological vetting of those seeking entry to the United States, and accusations that American Muslims harbor terrorists — stoked popular fears in the aftermath of terrorist attacks in Europe, California and Florida. Potok wrote that Trump’s rhetoric has helped fuel a spike in anti-Muslim sentiment, a view that is shared by several other civil rights advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

*Southern Poverty Law Center


Traditional fascism such as we found in Franco's Spain and the Argentine manifest themselves imn  groups such as "Tradition,Family,Property," Or even Hitler;s talk of blood and soil, show that populist grass roots man of the people image that Trump tried so hard to cultivate, we see the echos of the sacred nature of property in Bannon;'s ideal of only property owns have any real stock in the system, The man of the people is a lie and the real authoritarian strong man rule is based in the elate who can sucker the ignorant and the lynch mob into thinking it was their idea to lynch the enemities of the elite.


Thursday, March 9, 2017

Trump wreck's nations clean water


Image result for Metacrock's blog water



TRUMP PLAN TO GUT STREAM PROTECTIONS IMPERILS TAP WATER OF 117 MILLION AMERICANS


http://www.ewg.org/research/trump-plan-gut-stream-protections-imperils-tap-water-117-million-americans

The Trump administration is threatening to remove safeguards that protect the drinking water of more than one-third of Americans.
Some 117 million people get at least some of their drinking water from small streams.[1] For 72 million people in 1,033 counties, more than half of their drinking water comes from small streams. Ensuring that their water is safe means keeping the water in these streams clean. (See map below. Click here for a more detailed interactive map.)
Right now, the Clean Water Act protects these streams from pollution. But this week President Trump issued an executive order directing Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt to rescind or revise the Clean Water Rule, or replace it with a new rule.
This critically important rule determines which streams, rivers and lakes are protected from pollution by the Clean Water Act. The rule also extends protection for millions of acres of wetlands that filter drinking water.
Industry and agribusiness have been pushing for years to roll back the Clean Water Rule and protect only the biggest streams and rivers. Now they’ve found a friend in the Trump administration.
Small streams are where big rivers start, and the best science confirms that dirty streams means even dirtier rivers. Millions of Americans drink water directly connected to 234,000 miles of small, potentially unprotected streams.
In 21 different states, small streams provide drinking water for 1 million or more people. (See chart below.) More than 5 million people in each New York, Texas and Pennsylvania get drinking water from small streams, as do more than 3 million in each California, Georgia, Maryland, Ohio, North Carolina and Arizona.




The New Administration Aims To Scale Back The Clean Water Act


http://www.savingthewest.org/blog/new-administration-aims-scale-back-clean-water-act/?utm_content=bufferf7db9&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer



President Donald Trump is moving to scale back which bodies of water are protected under the federal authority of the Clean Water Act. He has signed documents directing the EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers to review the rule.Environmentalists fear that scaling the Clean Water Act back is the first step to eliminating it altogether. It designates major bodies of freshwater within the United States as federal lands and offers protection to these bodies of water from pollution. Some of the debate may be calmed by having the law more clearly define which bodies of water are protected, and which are not:
In Tuesday’s executive order, Trump said that in any future proposed rule, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should consider Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion in a 2006 Supreme Court ruling, which focused on the scope of the Clean Water Act.In that case, Scalia stated  that the “waters of the United States” are limited to “only relatively permanent, standing or flowing bodies of water.” He added: “The phrase does not include channels through which water flows intermittently or ephemerally, or channels that periodically provide drainage for rainfall.”Read More

Hundreds of current, former EPA employees urge Senate to reject Trump’s nominee for the agency

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/02/06/hundreds-of-current-former-epa-employees-urge-senate-to-reject-trumps-nominee-for-the-agency/?utm_term=.a971672eb567




Nearly 450 former Environmental Protection Agency employees Monday urged Congress to reject President Trump’s nominee to run the agency, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, even as current employees in Chicago sent the same message during a noon rally.
“We retirees, we tend to like to lay low. But this has gotten a bunch of us quite concerned,” said Bruce Buckheit, whose three decades in government included working in the EPA’s enforcement division under the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
Republicans have defended Pruitt as a capable leader who will return the agency to its core mission of protecting the environment while rolling back what they see as years of regulatory overreach that has unnecessarily burdened industry. A coalition of nearly two-dozen conservative advocacy groups has backed his nomination, insisting that Pruitt has “demonstrated his commitment to upholding the Constitution and ensuring the EPA works for American families and consumers.”


Monday, March 6, 2017

from daily action

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is sweatin' it out down in old D.C. on Thursday after seemingly getting caught having lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing about whether he'd had "communications with the Russians" during the 2016 presidential campaign. A number of Democrats have called on Sessions to resign his job, and even several Republicans have said the issue creates a conflict of interest that should require Sessions to recuse himself from any involvement in the Department of Justice's apparently ongoing investigation into contacts between Russian officials and Trump advisers. (Update, 7:15 p.m.: Sessions says he'll recuse himself from all current and future Trump campaign-related investigations.)
Senators who've said Sessions should resign:
Senators who've said Sessions should recuse himself:
Representatives who've said Sessions should resign:
Representatives who've said Sessions should recuse himself:
We'll continue to update this list as it, presumably, keeps growing.

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Extreme emergency 9 terifying bills Reps putting though



Resistance Report

http://resistancereport.com/politics/gop-bills-congress/

1. H.R. 861: To terminate the Environmental Protection Agency

This bill — cosponsored by Republican members of Congress from fossil fuel-producing states — is just one sentence long, and says nothing about what would happen to the multiple environmental regulations the EPA has instituted since 1970, or its multibillion-dollar budget, or its thousands of staffers. H.R. 861 is currently awaiting action in the subcommittee on environment.

2. H.R. 610: Tax dollars for private schools

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) introduced this bill in January, which would redistribute funding earmarked for public schools in the form of vouchers for parents to send children to private schools. Over the long term, this would eventually bankrupt public schools, and create a stratified education system in which cash-strapped public schools would be unable to meet the educational needs of low-income students. The bill is awaiting action in the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

3. H.R. 899: To terminate the Department of Education

If this bill, introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), becomes law, the U.S. Department of Education would terminate by the end of 2018. The bill’s brevity leaves many questions unanswered, like what would happen with Department of Education grants for public schools and universities, its budget, or its staff. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has said she would personally be “fine” if the agency she heads were to be abolished.

4. H.J.R. 69: To repeal a rule protecting wildlife

Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), whose constituents likely include hunters who kill wildlife for sport rather than for food, introduced this joint resolution voicing displeasure with a Department of Interior rule that prohibits “non-subsistence” hunting in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. The resolution passed the House and is awaiting action in the Senate.

5. H.R. 370: To repeal the Affordable Care Act

While President Obama was in office, House Republicans voted at least 60 times to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare — despite its futility. However, the Trump administration has made the repeal of Obamacare a top priority, meaning the repeal bill from Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas) is likely to pass.

6. H.R. 354: To defund Planned Parenthood

Despite the widely publicized debunking of the video alleging the women’s health nonprofit was selling human organs, Republicans are still refusing to stop destroying Planned Parenthood. Rep. Diane Black (R-Tennessee) introduced a bill that would prevent any federal grants from going to Planned Parenthood for a full year unless they swore to not perform abortions. As the chart below from Planned Parenthood shows, only 3 percent of Planned Parenthood resources go toward abortions, while the vast majority of funding is used to help low-income women get STD tests, contraceptive care, and breast cancer screenings:
7. H.R. 785: National Right-to-Work legislation
Conservative ideologue Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) is aiming to cripple unions at the nationwide level with a bill that would systematically deprive labor unions of the funding they need to operate. Unions often provide one of the crucial pillars of support for Democratic candidates and causes, and conservatives aim to destroy them once and for all by going after their funding. It’s important to note that right-to-work is bad for all workers, not just union members — in 2015, the Economic Policy Institute learned that wages in right-to-work states are roughly 3.2 percent lower than in non-right-to-work states.

8. H.R. 83: Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act

Multiple cities and states around the country have openly stated that they won’t abide by President Trump’s plan to aggressively round up and deport undocumented immigrants. A bill by Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pennsylvania) would strip all federal funding of any city that doesn’t obey Trump’s immigration policies for up to a year.

9. H.R. 147: To criminalize abortion

Rep. Trent Franks (R-Arizona) wants to aggressively prosecute pregnant women seeking abortions, along with abortion providers, by making abortion a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. The bill is currently awaiting action in the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
To fight back against these bills, call 202-224-3121, ask for your member of Congress, and tell them to vote no.

Tom Cahill is a writer for the Resistance Report based in the Pacific Northwest. He specializes in coverage of political, economic, and environmental news. You can contact him via email at tom.v.cahill@gmail.com, or follow him on Facebook. 

Saturday, March 4, 2017

Daily Action

"NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW"
Today's Daily Action is to call both of your Senators to demand that Sessions resign as Attorney General. Forget whatever Donald Trump said about draining the swamp. What's becoming abundantly clear is that if you're wealthy donor or a former Senator or part of the Trump Administration, then you don't have to follow the law. You don't have to be ethical. You don't have to tell the truth. You don't have to be qualified. You don't have to pay your taxes. You don't even have to be a patriot. Because Congress will give you every benefit of the doubt.
If one of us did what Sessions did, we would be charged with perjury for blatantly lying under oath. And imagine if Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch had done such a thing! But because it's Sessions, hardly any Senators are willing to tell the truth: Sessions lied under oath and therefore must resign as Attorney General. Call your Senators and tell them to stand up for the rule of law and for basic fairness. If we have to follow the law, then they have to follow the law. Sessions must resign and his statements under oath must be investigated.
"No one is above the law"--as Sessions himself said in an extensive explanation of why our laws against perjury must be enforced regardless of the political ramifications.
Sample script: "Hi, this is X calling from Y. Jeff Session once said of Bill Clinton that 'no one is above the law.' Why then is he being allowed to stay on as Attorney General when he has broken the law? Recusal is a good first step, but tell the Senator to do the right thing and call for his resignation. Because Sessions was right about one thing: This is America, and no one is above the law."
To sign up for Daily Action alerts, text the word DAILY to 228466 today! To reach your Senator without subscribing, you can just call 844 241 1141.
"The American people believe no one is above the law.”
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM

Thursday, March 2, 2017

Daily action alert from d/aily action

seeside bar for daily action oin face book

Late last night, America learned that our Attorney General apparently perjured himself during his Senate confirmation hearing. When he told the Senate that he didn't have any meetings with the Russians during the campaign, Jefferson Sessions lied under oath. In fact, he met Putin's Ambassador to the US at least twice. He now says that didn't count as a meeting with the Russians.
Our Senators must demand that a Special Prosecutor is named at the Justice Department because Sessions cannot investigate himself and, frankly, should resign. The time has also come for the Senate to create a bipartisan, independent Select Committee with the resources and expertise to properly investigate all of Putin's attempts to influence our electoral process and government-- because they cannot do this job through their regular committees.
Consider this: Jeff Sessions is now the FOURTH TRUMP APPOINTEE to lie under oath during a Senate hearing, get away with apparent perjury, and still get confirmed:
1) Steve Mnuchin lied under oath about his bank not robo-signing mortgages while he was CEO.
2) Tom Price lied under oath about his insider trading in health care stocks while he was in Congress.
3) Scott Pruitt lied under oath about his use of a personal email account for his work emails as Oklahoma's Attorney General.
4) And now, perhaps most egregiously of all, Jeff Sessions lied under oath about meeting with Russians during the campaign.
With a confirmation record like this, how can we trust the Senate to connect the dots on Vladimir Putin and his professional spies, blackmailers, propagandists, and murderers?
An independent bipartisan Select Committee investigation like the 9/11 commission is necessary because Vladimir Putin poses a grave national security threat to the United States.
Please make the time to call both of your Senators and tell them to take this seriously, to move quickly, and to put country ahead of party and ahead of committee jurisdiction turf battles.
Here's a sample script: "Hi, my name is X and I am calling from Y. I am calling to urge Senator Z to put country over party and demand that a special prosecutor be named at the Justice Department to investigate the Trump campaign's ties to Russia. The Senator must also push for a bipartisan, independent Select Committee to investigate all of Putin's attempts to influence our electoral process and government."
To sign up for Daily Action alerts, text the word DAILY to 228466 today!

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

My response to Trump's speech last night

So Trump refrained from acting like a fool, he made himself seem less insane for one night and now he's presidential? no, he's still destroying all progress made in 20th century,He laid it out rationally, Euphemisms and all euphemisms and all.So he can seem rational but he sill pushes the same insane agenda.
That is just his good cop/ bad cop negotiation style. He's schizophrenic so he plays both parts. He also proposed an office of propaganda to make false accusations against illegal aliens,
Don't be taken in.

Do you think this makes up for trump's fascist agenda? feel free to join in the comment section.